Side-mount Rigs – A UK Perspective

By Martin Robson, PADI TecRec Trimix Instructor, Side-mount and Cave IT

When newer divers hear the words ‘side-mount’ many think it is a way of squirming into tight cave passages, which might not sound like fun, or it is just like carrying stage cylinders, but without any back-mounted cylinders.

Neither is strictly true. Whilst side-mounted cylinders can allow suitably trained cave divers to enter caves which are too small to be dived safely in back-mounts and to therefore minimise the impact they have on the cave environment, there are many and varied reasons for diving side-mount.

It could be that the dive site is not easily accessible, and so to carry separate cylinders is easier than a twin set. Similarly some divers choose side-mounts simply because the weight of a twin set on their backs is a little too much for them, for whatever the reason.

However, true side-mount configuration is not just like carrying stage cylinders minus the back-mounts. Stage cylinders, no matter how tightly attached, can have a tendency to hang below the diver’s body just a little. What we are aiming for with side-mount is to have the cylinders almost in line with our bodies when we are horizontal in the water and thus be nicely streamlined.

In order to do this you will need some equipment specifically designed for side-mount. Broadly speaking this equipment comprises of some form of side-mount harness and a wing or other suitable buoyancy device.

There a definitely two schools of thought on these kit requirements. The American system, which can be seen a lot in the cave diving regions of Florida, has been developed from the combined ideas both of cave-divers and more mainstream manufacturers and has evolved into what can be had today. Typically this would be a soft harness originally designed for back-mounts (and still recognizable as such) but adapted to mount cylinders in side mount and to take a wing mounted to it (without the wing taking on a mind of it’s own under water – bear in mind there are no cylinders on your back to hold it in place). The other common option is a complete integrated harness and wing that are permanently fixed to each other.

The American systems are simple to use and do not require any user modifications (although of course we all like to personalise our dive kit). When diving they tend to sit the cylinders ‘lower down’. By this I mean that the cylinder valve will perhaps be as low down your torso as the bottom of your ribs and if you stood up the bottom of cylinders can be as low as your knees. The other consideration with this style of equipment is that an integrated set up can weigh as much or more than a backplate and wing!

The ‘UK’ style of side-mount system has been derived from all sorts of home-made ideas generated primarily from members of the Cave Diving Group (CDG) whose foundations come from cavers who turned to cave diving as a way of continuing their explorations when the caves they were penetrating took a turn underwater!

These set-ups are usually a lot less bulky and carry the cylinders a lot tighter and higher on the body to minimise the profile of the diver. Nowadays a number of commercially available harnesses are on the market which follow this simple and streamlined approach. Of course with a background from dry cavers, and the need sometimes to carry kit a long way underground prior to a dive, the ‘UK’ set-ups are often very much lighter than their American counterparts. Some UK style harnesses do need a little bit of modification to allow a wing to be fitted but it isn’t a difficult thing to achieve, and some do have wing attachment kits available as an optional extra.

So if you fancy having a go, find yourself a Side-mount Instructor and jump in. The equipment may look very different, but if you try it, you might find you like it so much that you never go back to your back-mounted cylinder(s).

5 Replies to “Side-mount Rigs – A UK Perspective”

  1. Hi Martin,

    Great article – completly agree with the two different sidemount setups we are seeing out there. I am struggling to see the benefits to have the sidemount harness and cylinders setup as you say the “American” way.

    Having the cylinders sit so far down the body would create more drag in general. I can see it making finning techniques like “helicopter” turn more difficult with increased drag.

    I definately find as you say the “UK” way is better, this method of having the cylinders higher up the body, in my opinion is a “true” sidemount configuration enabling valves to be protected and far superior trim than the other method.

    Pleased can you answer back on this article explaining the Pros and Cons you find for noth the “Amercian and UK” sidemount way..?

    Regards, Steve

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: